Evaluating the Impact of Remote Patient Examinations: A Systematic Review of Telehealth Outcomes
Abstract
Objective: This systematic review aims to evaluate the impact of remote patient examinations on healthcare outcomes, focusing on diagnostic accuracy, patient satisfaction, and treatment efficacy. With telemedicine's rapid expansion, understanding these effects is crucial for optimizing patient care and informing healthcare policies.
Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library, targeting studies published from 2016 onward. Inclusion criteria were studies that examined patient outcomes in remote examination contexts, such as telemedicine and telehealth consultations. Quality assessments of the included studies were performed using PRISMA guidelines to ensure rigorous evaluation.
Results: The review identified consistent benefits of remote examinations in terms of patient satisfaction and accessibility, with many studies reporting equivalent patient outcomes compared to in-person consultations. However, limitations were noted in diagnostic accuracy for certain conditions, and challenges included technology reliability, access disparities, and limitations in conducting physical assessments remotely.
Conclusion: Remote patient examinations present a promising alternative to traditional care, with clear benefits for accessibility and convenience. However, further research is needed to address diagnostic limitations and ensure equitable access to telehealth services. These findings underscore the need for robust telemedicine infrastructure and training to maximize the potential of remote examinations in healthcare delivery.
Letters in High Energy Physics (LHEP) is an open access journal. The articles in LHEP are distributed according to the terms of the creative commons license CC-BY 4.0. Under the terms of this license, copyright is retained by the author while use, distribution and reproduction in any medium are permitted provided proper credit is given to original authors and sources.
Terms of Submission
By submitting an article for publication in LHEP, the submitting author asserts that:
1. The article presents original contributions by the author(s) which have not been published previously in a peer-reviewed medium and are not subject to copyright protection.
2. The co-authors of the article, if any, as well as any institution whose approval is required, agree to the publication of the article in LHEP.
